The Fascinator

The Fascinator

Share this post

The Fascinator
The Fascinator
Blood Lines: Power, Succession, and the Politics of Royal Paternity

Blood Lines: Power, Succession, and the Politics of Royal Paternity

how succession anxiety and political maneuvering [still] fuel royal paternity scandals

Amanda Matta's avatar
Amanda Matta
Feb 06, 2025
∙ Paid
19

Share this post

The Fascinator
The Fascinator
Blood Lines: Power, Succession, and the Politics of Royal Paternity
1
Share

When it comes to monarchy, blood isn’t just thicker than water—it’s the very foundation of power. In royal history, few accusations are as politically explosive as questioning the paternity of an heir. The mere suggestion that a prince or princess isn’t of true royal stock can destabilize dynasties, fuel conspiracies, and justify coups.

No scandal illustrates this more thoroughly than the so-called “Warming Pan Baby” affair of 1688. Perhaps you remember it from world history class?

enedetto Gennari the Younger, Portrait of Queen Mary of Modena with Prince James Stuart, ca. 1688.

TLDR; James II of England was already an unpopular king when his wife, Mary of Modena, gave birth to a son. This should have been a moment of triumph: the birth of a long-awaited male heir securing the Catholic king’s dynasty. Instead, it triggered a full-blown political crisis.

The Fascinator is a reader-supported publication. To receive exclusive historical deep dives like this one, consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Whispers spread that the baby wasn’t truly the royal couple’s child at all. Instead, it was claimed, the baby was a fraud—smuggled into Mary’s birth chamber in a warming pan. The rumor was absurd (warming pans of the era, by and large, could never conceal a whole infant), but the scandal gained traction because it served a political purpose. Its perpetrators wanted to discredit James II, in turn justifying his overthrow in the Glorious Revolution.

For more on the history that played into the Warming Pan scandal, you might like the introductory installment of my “Off With Her Head” series, which features a case study of Mary of Modena:

Off With Her Head: Royal Scapegoats

Amanda Matta
·
February 1, 2024
Off With Her Head: Royal Scapegoats

Scapegoat.

Read full story

This wasn’t the first—nor would it be the last—time that royal paternity became a battlefield for power. Throughout history, the legitimacy of heirs has been called into question not out of genuine concern, but as a weapon wielded by rival factions. From medieval courts to modern tabloids, the bloodline of royals has always been scrutinized, sometimes with shocking consequences.

So let’s explore how these accusations shape history, who benefits from them, and why royal blood remains a political obsession.

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2025 Amanda Matta
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start writingGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture

Share